Hell breaking loose on my heart
If you are incapable of showering
LOVE
Do not be pretentious with
Old silly sympathy.
Sunday, September 26, 2010
Friday, September 10, 2010
The cost and the cause
9-11 Edited by Greg Ruggiero | |
Product Details | DescriptionWINNER OF THE 2002 FIRECRACKER BOOK AWARD In 9-11 Noam Chomsky dissects the root causes of the September 11th catastrophe, the historical precedents for it, and the possible outcomes as the United States responds with its "new war on terrorism." Read the Publishers Weekly feature about Chomsky For Chomsky, the atrocities of 9-11 are something quite new in world affairs, marking the first time since 1812 that the U.S. mainland was attacked (an important distinction from Pearl Harbor, which was U.S. territory, but effectively a colony). As Chomsky writes, in the past half century particularly, [the U.S.] resorted to force throughout much of the world. For the first time, the guns have been directed the other way. That is a dramatic change. Chomsky believes that the attacks have been harmful in ways that extend far beyond the initial death toll and ongoing national emergency. For example, he believes they represent a devastating blow to Israeli-Palestinian negotiations. Most importantly and provocatively, Chomsky argues that in the world after 9-11, it is no longer possible to hold our enemies to one standard, ourselves to another. Chomsky argues for an international rule of law; existing bodies such as the U.N. and World Court must be given credence and then relied upon. React with extreme violence, he writes, and expect to escalate the cycle of violence, leading to still further atrocities such as the one that is inciting the call for revenge. But if the goal is to reduce the probability of further atrocities, then rather follow lawful procedure, presenting the evidence and letting independent world bodies direct the appropriate response. As for why the attack happened, Chomsky exposes how this question is rarely raised in a serious way. And claims that to refuse to face this question is to choose to increase significantly the probability of further crimes of this kind. In 9-11, Noam Chomsky's comments on the September 11th attacks, the new war on terrorism, Osama bin Laden, U.S. involvement with Afghanistan, media control, and the long-term implications of America's military attacks abroad. Informed by his deep understanding of the gravity of these issues and the global stakes, 9-11 demonstrates Chomsky's impeccable knowledge of U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East and South Asia, and sheds light on the rapidly shifting balance of world power. Speaking out against escalating violence, Chomsky critically examines the United States' own foreign policy record and considers what international institutions might be employed against underground networks and national states accused of terrorism. 9-11's analysis will affect debate for months to come, and will also be a measure of how well the media is able to serve its role of informing the citizenry, so crucial to our democracy in times of war. Winner of the 2002 Firecracker Book Award, 9-11 spent seven weeks on the The New York Times Extended Bestseller List and on a number of others including: Toronto Globe and Mail (#1), Village Voice (#1), Boston Globe (#2), Book Sense (#2), Washington Post (#3), Los Angeles Times (#3), San Francisco Chronicle (#4), Publishers Weekly (#6), and Amazon.com (#24, #1 eBook). It has been translated into 23 foreign languages, and published worldwide in 26 countries. Noam Chomsky's international anti-war bestseller, 9-11 has become the subject of debate in mainstream media. Following controversial feature articles in the New York Times and Washington Post , arch-conservative William Bennett proposed on Paula Zahn's CNN morning show that he and Chomsky debate live. The "debate" took place on Thursday, May 30, 2002. Meanwhile, the Guardian (U.K.) published an article on American coverage generally and CNN's commentary specifically, comparing it to Soviet-style "conformity which muzzles public discourse." |
facebook::Complicated settings::::If you
would rather not have your intimate details shared with complete
strangers, all you need to do is to spend a couple of years researching
Facebook and earn a doctorate while you are at it. Because that's how
complex the new settings are, completely baffling the users to the point...
when they simply do not care about privacy anymore. There is also the
old issue of having to share ALL of your information with the users of
an application every time you want to add it to your profile, even if it
is a simple quiz. If you thought that was the worst
of it, here is more. Even if you do eventually gain mastery of the
Facebook applications and Even if you remove the information from your
public profile, all your likes and dislikes are still stored by
Facebook, so it knows what advertisements it can bombard you with. Also
a new change allows for information to be shared with other websites
while you are logged in to Facebook. For instance, if you visit a
website such as CNN's website, a small widget on the site allows you to
receive updates from friends directly on to the site. However, it has
been decided not to share your private information with those websites –
yet. With Facebook changing its privacy policy every few months it is
impossible to know what can be expected of it.
Thursday, September 9, 2010
Birendranath Chatterjee
In 1902, Viren joined the University of Oxford, while preparing for the Indian Civil Service. Later, he became a law student of the Middle Temple. In Germany, to avoid suspicion he enrolled in a university as a student. As a student in comparative linguistics at the University of Saxe-Anhalt in April 1914, Viren met Dr. Abinash Bhattacharya alias Bhatta and some other nationalist Indian students. The former was well-known to the influential members as belonging to the Kaiser’s immediate circle. Early in September 1914, they formed a “German Friends of India” Association, and were received by the brother of Wilhelm II, wherein they signed a treaty in favour of German help in order to oust the British from India.
Sunday, September 5, 2010
Mystery of Cosmos
According to folklore the French physicist Pierre Laplace, when asked by Napoleon where God fitted into his mathematical account of the universe, replied: “I had no need of that hypothesis.” Although cosmology has advanced enormously since the time of Laplace, the situation remains the same: there is no compelling need for a supernatural being or prime mover to start the universe off. But when it comes to the laws that explain the big bang, we are in murkier waters.
Friday, September 3, 2010
Cricket scams
Pakistan seems to be under the clout of such forces which aim to destroy not only the peace in the sub continent but the very social fabric of Pakistan. I deeply feel for the poor Pakistani citizens.
Indian Nuclear Liability Act
Nuclear Liability Bill: Under the influence of FICCI and US nuclear industry, those pushing for the bill have chosen not learn from the mistakes of US firms who embarked on a nuclear power strategy under the assumption that the radioactive waste management problem was not difficult and would be solved relatively quickly. Subsequent events have proved otherwise because radioactive waste management efforts are quite different from industrial and municipal waste management
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
